HCV Prevalence in Pakistan, An Alarming Situation

Genprice » Scientific Journal » HCV Prevalence in Pakistan, An Alarming Situation

HCV disease is among life threatening general medical issues around the world, with more than 170–200 million HCV infected individuals worldwide [1] including around 17 million patients from Pakistan [2]. Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is being caused by HCV. 27% of liver cirrhosis and 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma cases are caused mere due to Hepatitis C [3]. Every year Hepatitis C cause around 350,000 individuals to loss their lives [4]. HCV is a RNA virus with a single sense positive strand and belongs to the Flaviviridae family [5]. Hepatitis C encodes for a polyprotein which is made of around 3010 amino acids , the genome of hepatitis C is 9.6 kb [6]. The auxiliary proteins (C, E1, E2, and p7) and nonstructural proteins (NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B) are created by this polyprotein when it is post translationally handled by viral and cell proteins [7].

Hepatitis C virus shows heterogeneity; with 6 noteworthy genotypes and numerous subtypes of hepatitis C have been renowned worldwide [8]. There is a variable occurrence of HCV genotypes and subtypes in various areas of the world . 1a, 1b, 2a, 2c, and 3a are the common subtypes found in New Zealand, Russia, North and South America, Japan, Europe, China, and Australia [3]. In Egypt, Middle East, Central Africa, and North Africa Genotype 4 is common [9]. In South Africa genotype 5 [10] and while in Southeast Asia genotype 6 is common [11]. In Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Nepal genotype 3 is the most pervasive genotype [12–15].
In China Genotype 1b is the most common genotype; however in a few areas of China genotype 2 has additionally been accounted [1]. In Pakistan, the commonness of Hepatitis C infection has been assessed to be 8% and is expanding progressively because of insufficiency in fundamental social insurance recourses and absence of the overall population mindfulness about security measures [8]. In Khyber Pukhtunkhwa area of Pakistan a few reviews have been conducted on commonness of HCV genotypes [17–20]. Nonetheless, in locale Bannu in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa district of Pakistan little has been accounted on predominance of HCV genotypes. In this manner, this review was directed to discover standard data on the predominance of hepatitis C genotypes in Bannu area of Pakistan. For better comprehension of HCV contamination, for
making mindfulness in the overall population and in this way for execution of preventive and helpful methodologies, the precise HCV genotyping is required.

HCV infection (HCV) is the most regular reason for unending viral hepatitis around the world. In the current years, disease with HCV has risen as a standout amongst the most widely recognized reasons for intense also, ceaseless liver ailments everywhere throughout the world [21]. Testing alone can’t separate between intense, constant, or settled contamination in hepatitis C infection, therefore a supplementary test should likewise be completed, including estimation of hostile to Hepatitis C immunoglobulin G movement file [22] or counter acting agent reactivities to particular HCV basic and non-structural proteins [23], to affirm a positive against Hepatitis C result [21]. Hepatitis C is known to have high rate of hereditary heterogeneity [24]. Hepatitis C strains can be distinguished into various hereditarily particular gatherings, known as genotypes, subtypes, secludes, and semi-species [25].
The hereditary variableness among hepatitis C strains for nucleotide arrangement characters of full-length successions for sorts is 65.8%–68.7% , for nucleotide grouping personalities of fulllength arrangements for subtypes is 76.9%–80.1%, and for nucleotide succession personalities of full-length arrangements for confines and semi-species is 90.8%–99% [26]. More than 50 subtypes, have been recognized so far which contrast by 31 to 34% in their nucleotide arrangements while the subtypes vary by 20 to 23% in their full-length genomic sequences. This broad hereditary variability, and also the propensity for change, has blocked antibody improvement against this infection [25]. As patients tainted with various genotypes react distinctively to antiviral medication treatment, ID of the contaminating genotype is inescapable to manage the right dosage and span of current blend treatment (pegylated alpha interferon in addition to ribavirin) [27]. HCV is likewise basic in Pakistan yet exact epidemiological data is very constrained. In the external boundaries of the urban areas and in the distant ranges, unfit medicinal and dental staff, woman wellbeing guests, birthing specialists, and hairdressers frequently utilize unsterilized and infected instruments which cause the potential wellsprings of spreading Hepatitis C disease in the metropolitan and rustic populace of Pakistan [28]. In spite of the fact that the correct proportion of this perpetual malady is not known, different reviews have demonstrated that 3–7% of populace of Pakistan is tainted [29].

A prior review announced that 8.9% of populace is tainted with hepatitis C in Mardan [30]. In areas such as Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where discovery and genotype assurance going before treatment are sporadic it is altogether unmistakable to investigate the level and appropriation of HCV genotypes. Subsequently, proper data to make singular treatment is required keeping in mind the end goal to expand the possibility of fruitful treatment result for every patient, rendering Hepatitis C genotyping examines essential and helpful devices to streamline management sort, term, and measurement. This review was intended to decide the dynamic HCV RNA disease and also to think about the HCV genotypes coursing in the review territory.
HCV is an irresistible sickness brought about by the HCV infection (HCV) fundamentally influencing the liver and causing certain liver disease [31]. Hepatitis C has a solitary stranded RNA genome and has a place with Hepacivirus [6]. Blood items, infected blood and body liquid are some significant hazard components for Hepatitis C transmission. Besides, utilization of polluted syringes, medicate mishandle, and utilization of hairdresser razor, dental methods, inking, ear piercing, needle therapy and high-chance sexual conduct are different methods of transmission [33]. In over 70% of the contaminated individuals, the infection gets to be distinctly unending and prompts to constant hepatitis, cirrhosis 5-20% , and 1–5% patients pass on from liver cirrhosis or liver malignancy [34]. As of late, World Health Organization (WHO) announced that almost 170 million individuals are incessantly tainted with Hepatitis C infection around the world. The pervasiveness of constant HCV ranges from 4% to 12% in Asia-pacific district [35]. More than 10 million individuals are experiencing this infection in Pakistan that contain to 6% of aggregate populace of Pakistan, with an increased dreariness and mortality [8].
In past little reviews Hepatitis C pervasiveness in some different urban communities of Pakistan was also elevated. In Lahore it was 16%, in Faisalabad 20.6% and 23.8% in Gujranwala [37,8]. The Hepatitis C determination is completed by recognizing the nearness of circling hostile to Hepatitis C antibodies utilizing Immuno chromatographic test (ICT) strategies. Due to the false inspiration rate of Hepatitis C with ICT based techniques, Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA) is viewed as more solid than the ICT based Hepatitis C conclusion.

In various contaminated patients going from intense settling HCV to constant liver sicknesses including cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma has variable clinical results of HCV [12]. The study of disease transmission, pathogenesis, and reaction to antiviral treatment is recognizable proof of the contaminating infection genotype is imperative for the investigation of numerous parts of Hepatitis C [13, 14]. For extensive scale epidemiological and exploratory reviews an appropriate and solid Hepatitis C genotyping strategy is unavoidable [11]. Various research facility systems went for recognizing the genotypes of Hepatitis C have been depicted [15]. Genotype of Hepatitis C assurance in full-length genomic grouping investigation took after by phylogenetic examination is still the brilliant standard. Despite the fact that this framework is costly and tedious and can’t be adjusted to clinical reviews or broad standard utilize [15]. PCR has been comprehensively utilized for genotyping [13], which is based upon the intensification of infection arrangements in clinical examples, utilizing sort particular groundworks that particularly enhance diversification of various hepatitis C genotypes [11, 16]. The expanding suggestion of HCV genotyping and focused on the need of simple, solid, financially knowledge, and quick methods for mass screening is done through data acquired from different parts of the world. For restorative administration of contaminated patients and to think about the science of HCV and HCV disease in research , the exact and delicate estimation of HCV RNA is vital [17].
In locale Mardan, as different areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa the clinical causes, hazard components, and seriousness of HCV contaminations and HCV genotypes are still ineffectively characterized. In area Buner Antibodies against HCV were seen in 11.70% of the contemplated populace, which demonstrates high commonness in contrast with 4.57% detailed by Muhammad and Jan [18]. In locale Mardan the investigation of Idrees and Riazuddin demonstrated that genotype 3a (26.44%) trailed by genotype 3b (16.52%) is pervasive and [19], where genotypes 3a and 3b were predominant among the examined populace [19]. Hepatitis C genotype 3a was discovered transcendent all in all populace in another review by Idrees and Riazuddin, [19]. In different nations like Argentina, genotype 2 of hepatitis C is more common [20]. Likewise, in Latin American locale Alfonso et al. (2001) watched genotype 1 in 61.4% and genotype 3 in 23.7% in HCV infected patients [21]. The occurrence of genotype 3a represents 68.94% of HCV
contaminations in Punjab, 76.88% in Sindh, 58% in KPK, and 60.71% in Balochistan territories of Pakistan were revealed in a current survey [22].

By the sort particular PCR the examination of epidemiological information was indicated and the contrasts between patients with single diseases and those with obviously blended contaminations were checked [13]. In 4.13% of tests mixed disease were seen [23]. Furthermore, 17.35% patients which showed hepatitis C by settled PCR were not written by sort particular PCR. 20.16% of the Hepatitis C constructive people in Khyber Paktunkhawan were untypable which is not in concurrence with our past data [22].
On the grounds that most of the times no proper indications are unique in the early phases of contamination and when side effects seem then the treatment of this disease becomes troublesome, so Hepatitis C is said to be quiet an slaughterer. Other than this, in a huge part of the creating nations finish is not genuine because of offices. The general population which are hostile to hepatitis C infection are screened through strips or by using HCV ELISA test for HCV contamination. However these strategies don’t show the most correct results and needs affectability [24]. Consequently, because of larger amounts of specificity and affectability than the serological approach sub-atomic discovery of Hepatitis C by PCR based techniques is unavoidable.
Hepatitis C virus contamination is considered as case of sicknesses in which coordinate detection of the infection is basic for a right finding. In contrast with other existing in vitro tests, RT-PCR has additional imminent for its analysis as it offers an extreme recognition of Hepatitis C[25]. The present review demonstrates that the appropriation of HCV genotype 3 in Mardan is like that in different territories of Pakistan. HCV sorts two and three are common here which can better react to interferon treatment however sorts 1 and 4 were additionally coursing that require increased handling. Appropriate epidemiological reviews and dealing procedures ought to be started in this area. Appropriate preventive measures ought to be additionally mulled over to control the spread of this ghastly sickness.
HCV is a worldwide medical issue and consistently up to 170 million individuals get to be distinctly contaminated with hepatitis C throughout the world with a death ratio of more than 350,000 individuals [5]. HCV has high predominance in creating and furthermore high populated
nations including Pakistan. A few variables add to expanding HCV predominance, for example, absence of mindfulness with respect to HCV transmission, and prudent steps among average folks, lacking symptomatic offices and skill in doctor’s facilities and open division labs [3]. As of late, many reviews have been led to explore the predominance of HCV in Pakistan [6,11]. As, just two or three (20-half) of tainted people clear the infection suddenly, while the lion’s share of patients create incessant hepatitis that is the reason a high disturbing recurrence of HCV viral disease was seen in various parts of the nation, for example, 20.6% in Faisalabad and 23.8% in Gujranwala [7,8]. Beforehand, a review was led to decide the pervasiveness of HCV genotypes in the all inclusive community of Balochistan region of Pakistan [9].

Besides, HCV and B infection seroprevalence and co-contaminations alongside HIV in infusing drug clients of Quetta were additionally revealed [10]. In the present review usually honed serological procedures (ICT and ELISA) were utilized to screen out the commonness of HCV in the youthful blood contributors in age gather 17–25 years (Table 1). We found that general commonness of HCV was 22.2% and 20.2% when tried by ICT and ELISA based techniques individually. Strikingly we watched that most extreme pervasiveness (26.3%) for hostile to HCV was found in the people of 25 years of age (n = 38) (Table 1). Despite the fact that our review gives no data with respect to HCV rate in the overall public; notwithstanding it represents the HCV commonness in the youthful blood givers, which mirrors a more particular review.
The most astounding weight of HCV in youthful people were seen in Quetta area of Baluchistan utilizing ICT and ELISA based Hepatitis C diagnostics which are not regularly done in different doctor’s facilities of Baloschistan. This may be further assessed in expanded specimen size, and PCR based HCV indicative in youthful blood givers. By and large practice, it was reliably revealed that viewing by ICT strategy may create fake actual outcomes, and is not suggested as a solitary analytic device for HepatitisC recognition [3,12]. To limit the odds of wrong inspiration, we reevaluate all the positive specimens checked by ICT technique, were additionally manipulated to monitor populace of Balochistan territory of Pakistan [9] and Hepatitis C and B infection increased spreeding alongside human immuno deficiency virus in infusing medicine clients of Quetta locale of Balochistan [10]. In any case, a general screening study for HCV contamination in the youthful solid male populace of the region was not yet detailed. Consequently, the present review was attempted to discover the commonness of HCV
contamination in the youthful guys extending from 17 to 25 years in Balochistan, Pakistan. Besides, utilization of an ICT (Immuno-chromatographic test) and ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) coupled HCV screening methodologies were utilized to report the HCV commonness. These discoveries might be useful to devise technique for the counteractive action of HCV related hazard components.
The atomic epidemiological reviews have in depth that noteworthy territorial contrasts have all the remarks of being available in the recurrence appropriation of Hepatitis C genotypes. on the other hand , word of Hepatitis C genotypes in geographically assorted districts encourages remedial choices and preventive procedures [22]. It has been accounted for that there are varieties in malady result and reaction to antiviral treatment of genotypes of hepatitis [23]. HCV bearing patients depends on subjective or quantitative viral identification and genotypes are not decided before treatment. Changeable reaction rates of Hepatitis tainted patients to antiviral treatment can’t be illustrious. The existing review was directed to decide pattern information on the predominance of Hepatitis C genotypes in a locale in Khyber PK area of Pakistan. The gauge data will aid in improved intellectual capacity of Hepatitis C disease, mindfulness in the overall population and resulting control methodologies. The dispersion of Hepatitis C genotypes was discovered variable among check patients. The genotype 3a was observed to be the most predominant genotype took after by 3b and 2a and genotype 1a was experiential to be less persistent . Consequences of the present review are in similarity with aftereffects of past reviews revealed from various districts of the KPK in Pakistan [20–25].

the most predominant genotype past conducted studies directed in India, Bangladesh, and Nepal likewise detailed that the genotype 3 [12–14]. In this review the measure utilized couldn’t decide Hepatitis C genotypes among an extensive number of Hepatitis C patients (23%). Be that as it may, there is a need to utilize more solid and delicate test for genotyping of Hepatitis C in untypeable examples. The appropriation of Hepatitis C genotypes might be erratic among the patients of different age groups. , though genotype 1a was watched all the more regularly in the more youthful populace inspects have declared that genotypes 1b and 2weremore predominant in more well-known patients [26, 27]. In patients matured over 50 years in France genotype 5 was every now and again identified [28]. In Iran genotype 3a was the most much of the time branded in patients under 40 years [29]..
The commonness of genotypes 2a and 3a was discovered expanding with expanding time of patients. discovered more predominant in age gathers over 35 years were patients matured over 50 years. In addition, genotype 1a was slightest persistent genotype identified in a patient of a more youthful age assemble under 34 years. this is important to soothing organization of Hepatitis soiled patients. Different studies have recommended that Hepatitis genotypes are related with various courses of communication.. The Hepatitis C genotypes declared in present study were disconnected from contributing patients with known course of transmission. In our review genotypes 3a and 3b were all the more as often as possible saw in patients with past history of shaving by hair stylists took after by various infusions 4 Hepatitis Research and Treatment got and dental procedures.
Whereas all the more frequently saw in patients who had history of dental methods genotypes 1a and 2a. Hepatitis genotype 2a was in addition basic in patients with past history of visit to hairdressers and getting different infusions. The likely courses of transmission of Hepatitis C genotypes have likewise been accounted for in other studies. The high pervasiveness of Hepatitis C virous genotype 3 is known to intravenous medication buffed in the United States and Europe [30]. In addition show consider and different study from Pakistan have additionally announced expanded prevalence of genotype 3 in those patients who had gotten a variety of helpful unsafe and senseless infusions by untrained wellbeing professionals especially in country zones. These untrained wellbeing experts typically utilize no not reusable syringe or utilized syringe and needles for more than one patient at the general social cover centered [24–32]. Be that as it may, high predominance of genotypes 3a, 3b, and 2a among patients of locale Bannu with history of shaving by hair stylists and dental systems has not been accounted for in the United States and Europe. In present review we saw in locale Bannu that uneducated hair stylists normal practice is to reuse of unsterilized razors and scissors for different clients. Likewise untrained wellbeing specialists at dental facilities are normally by and by of utilizing utilized and unsterilized dental hardware for different people. Subsequently, these hair stylists and wellbeing professionals are advancing the danger of transmission of HCVinfection starting with one individual then onto the next in this area. In a patient with genotype 1a the conceivable course of transmission saw in the present review was dental technique. This is reliable with consequence of a past review from Pakistan where the vast majority of patients with genotype 1a had a background marked by dental strategies [24].

Impact of HCV genotype on the treatment reaction Genotype impacts the viability of antiviral treatment, which is evaluated in view of a managed virologic reaction (SVR). The European Association for the Study of the Liver characterizes SVR as imperceptible HCV RNA 24 weeks subsequent to finishing antiviral treatment[21]. Imperceptible HCV RNA 12 weeks after finishing treatment predicts SVR after 24 [22] Dual treatment with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin produces SVR in roughly 40–50% of treatment-naı¨ve individuals with G1 contamination. Adding boceprevir or telaprevir to peg-IFN and ribavirin enhances the general SVR rate for G1 by no less than 20–25%[23]. The SVR rate with peg-IFN and ribavirin is around 80% for G2 and G3, when results from the two genotypes are combined[21]. In this way, numerous clinicians view G2 and G3 contaminations as moderately ‘simple to-treat’. The name of ‘difficult to-treat’ for G1 and G4 contaminations can similarly be viewed as a distortion. For instance, in light of peg-IFN and ribavirin, SVR rates fluctuate from roughly 43 to 70% in G4, with reaction guided treatment accomplishing SVR inover 80% of patients in a few reviews [24]. It is likely that differencesin SVR rates may not just be because of viral components making a genotype ‘difficult to-treat’ or ‘simple to-treat’, however might be identified with the host attributes of the accomplice considered. This survey looks at the commitment viral and have variables have to the accomplishment of treatment in G3-contaminated patients. However, as this audit demonstrates, SVR rates are presumably not homogenous all through the G3 partner and the ‘around 80%’ figure might be a distortion.
Benchmark viral load can impact the probability of accomplishing a SVR. A few reviews have demonstrated that patients contaminated with a high popular heap of G3 accomplish bring down SVR rates. A meta-examination including 2275 patients evaluated the viability of a 24-week course of peg-IFN and ribavirin in subjects tainted with G2 or G3. The eight reviews incorporated into the meta-investigation utilized different edges for low popular load (£400,000 to £800,000 IU/ml). SVR rates were 75% in individuals tainted with G2 and 69% in those contaminated with G3 (chances proportion [OR]: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.23–1.80). G3 patients with high viremia demonstrated lower SVR rates (58%) than patients with a high G2 viral load (75%; OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.80–3.09). The contrast between genotypes in patients with low viremia was less stamped: 75 and 79% for G3 and G2, separately (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.08–2.09) [28]. In any
case, contrasts in the meanings of viral load between the reviews entangle elucidation of these information. The instruments fundamental the distinctive connections between viral load and 0SVR in G2 and G3 additionally require advance examination. In any case, high viremia may offer a marker of more quick malady movement, a speculation potentially upheld In Europe, G1a and G3 are the genotypes most normally transmitted among intravenous medication clients (IDUs) [18]. Remedial blood items predominately transmit G1b [18]. In this manner, G1a and G3 have a tendency to be the most well-known genotypes in nations with a high rate of transmission among IDUs. In the UK, for instance, G1 and G3 represent around 45 and 40% of HCV contaminations [14].

In some other European nations (counting Greece, Poland and Sweden), G3 represents up to 30% of HCV contaminations [14]. Impact of HCV genotype on the treatment reaction Genotype impacts the viability of antiviral treatment, which is surveyed in view of a supported virologic reaction (SVR). The European Association for the Study of the Liver characterizes SVR as imperceptible HCV RNA 24 weeks in the wake of finishing antiviral treatment [21]. Imperceptible HCV RNA 12 weeks in the wake of completing treatment predicts SVR after 24 [22]. Double treatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin produces SVR in around 40–50% of treatment-naı¨ve individuals with G1 disease. Adding boceprevir or telaprevir to peg-IFN and ribavirin enhances the general SVR rate for G1 by no less than 20–25% [23]. The SVR rate with peg-IFN and ribavirin is roughly 80% for G2 and G3, when results from the two genotypes are joined [21]. Along these lines, numerous clinicians view G2 and G3 diseases as generally ‘simple to-treat’.
The name of ‘difficult to-treat’ for G1 and G4 diseases can similarly be viewed as a misrepresentation. For instance, in light of peg-IFN and ribavirin, SVR rates change from around 43 to 70% in G4, with reaction guided treatment accomplishing SVR in more than 80% of patients in a few reviews [24]. It is likely that distinctions in SVR rates may not just be because of viral components making a genotype ‘difficult to-treat’ or ‘simple to-treat’, however might be identified with the host attributes of the associate contemplated. This audit analyzes the commitment viral and have components have to the accomplishment of treatment in G3-tainted patients. Be that as it may, as this audit demonstrates, SVR rates are likely not homogenous all through the G3 companion and the ‘around 80%’ figure might be a distortion. Viral load Baseline
viral load can impact the probability of accomplishing a SVR. A few reviews have demonstrated that patients contaminated with a high popular heap of G3 accomplish bring down SVR rates. A meta-examination enveloping 2275 patients evaluated the viability of a 24-week course of pegIFN and ribavirin in subjects tainted with G2 or G3. The eight reviews incorporated into the meta-investigation utilized different edges for low popular load. SVR rates were 75% in individuals tainted with G2 and 69% in those contaminated with G3 (chances proportion [OR]: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.23–1.80). G3 patients with high viremia indicated bring down SVR rates (58%) than patients with a high G2 viral load (75%; OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.80–3.09). The distinction between genotypes in patients with low viremia was less stamped: 75 and 79% for G3 and G2, individually (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.08–2.09) [28]. Be that as it may, contrasts in the meanings of viral load between the reviews muddle understanding of these information. The systems fundamental the diverse connections between viral load and SVR in G2 and G3 likewise require facilitate examination. Nonetheless, high viremia may offer a marker of more fast illness movement, a theory conceivably bolstered by the more quick movement of fibrosis in individuals with G3 HCV contrasted and G2. Furthermore, high popular load may mirror a hindered have safe reaction or an improved capacity of G3 to avoid have resistances.

[1] S. Butt,M. Idrees, H. Akbar et al., “The changing epidemiology pattern and frequency distribution of hepatitis C virus in Pakistan,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 10, no. 5, pp.595–600, 2010. [2] M. Idrees, S. Rafique, I. Rehman et al., “Hepatitis C virus genotype 3a infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: Pakistan experience,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 40, pp. 5080–5085, 2009. [3] M. J. Alter, “Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 2436–2441, 2007. [4] A. Hatzakis, S. Wait, J. Bruix et al., “The state of hepatitis B and C in Europe: report from the hepatitis B and C summit conference,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2011.
[5] C. H. Hagedorn, E.H. van Beers, andC. de Staercke, “Hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NS5B polymerase),” Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, vol. 242, p. 327, 2000. [6] N. Kato, “Molecular virology of hepatitis C virus,” Acta Medica Okayama, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 133–159, 2001. [7] M. Liew, M. Erali, S. Page, D. Hillyard, and C. Wittwer, “Hepatitis C genotyping by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 158–163, 2004. [8] M. Idrees, A. Lal, M. Naseem, and M. Khalid, “High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the largest province of Pakistan,” Journal of Digestive Diseases, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2008. [9] A. R. N. Zekri, A. A. Bahnassy, H. M. A. El-Din, and H. M. Salama, “Consensus siRNA for inhibition of HCV genotype-4 replication,” Virology Journal, vol. 6, article 13, 2009. [10] R.W.Chamberlain,N.Adams, A. A. Saeed, P. Simmonds, and R.M. Elliott, “Complete nucleotide sequence of a type 4 hepatitis C virus variant, the predominant genotype in the Middle East,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1341–1347, 1997. [11] A. S. Abdulkarim, N. N. Zein, J. J. Germer et al., “Hepatitis C virus genotypes and hepatitis G virus in hemodialysis patients from Syria: identification of two novel hepatitis C virus subtypes,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 571–576, 1998. [12] N.N. Zein, “Clinical significance of hepatitisCvirus genotypes,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 223–235, 2000. [13] D. Amarapurkar, M. Dhorda, A. Kirpalani, A. Amarapurkar, and S. Kankonkar, “Prevalence of hepatitis C genotypes in Indian patients and their clinical significance,” Journal of Association of Physicians of India, vol. 49, pp. 983–985, 2001. [14] S. Singh, V.Malhotra, and S. K. Sarin, “Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in India,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 119, no. 4, pp.145–148, 2004. [15] I. Rehman,M. Idrees, M. Ali et al., “Hepatitis C virus genotype 3a with phylogenetically distinct origin is circulating in Pakistan,” Genetic Vaccines and Therapy, vol. 9, article 2, 2011.
[16] H. Okamoto, Y. Sugiyama, S. Okada et al., “Typing hepatitis C virus by polymerase chain reaction with type-specific primers: Application to clinical surveys and tracing infectious sources,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 673–679, 1992. [17] A. Ali, H. Ahmed, and M. Idrees, “Molecular epidemiology of Hepatitis C virus genotypes in Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw of Pakistan,” Virology Journal, vol. 7, pp. 203–210, 2010. [18] I. M. Idrees, H. Ahmed, M. Ali, L. Ali, and A. Ahmed, “Hepatitis C virus genotypes circulating in district Swat of Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw, Pakistan,” Virology Journal, vol. 8, article 16, 2011. [19] A. Z. Safi, Y. Waheed, J. Sadat, S. Salahuddin, U. Saeed, and M. Ashraf, “Molecular study of HCV detection, genotypes and their routes of transmission in North West Frontier Province, Pakistan,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 532–536, 2012. [20] S. Q. Afridi, M. N. Zahid, M. Z. Shabbir et al., “Prevalence of HCV genotypes in district Mardan,” Virology Journal, vol. 10, article 90, 2013.

[21] D. B. Strader,T.Wright, D. L.Thomas, and L. B. Seeff, “Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C,” Hepatology, vol.39, no. 4, pp. 1147–1171, 2004. [22] S. Klimashevskaya, A. Obriadina, T. Ulanova et al., “Distinguishing acute from chronic and resolved hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections by measurement of anti-HCV immunoglobulin G avidity index,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 3400–3403, 2007. [23] A. C. Araujo, I. V. Astrakhantseva, H. A. Fields, and S.Kamili, “Distinguishing acute from chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection based on antibody reactivities to specific HCV structural and nonstructural proteins,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 54–57, 2011. [24] L. Stuyver, W. van Arnhem, A. Wyseur, F. Hernandez, E. Delaporte, and G. Maertens, “Classification of hepatitis C viruses based on phylogenetic analysis of the envelope 1 and nonstructural 5B regions and identification of five additional subtypes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 21, pp. 10134– 10138, 1994. [25] J. Bukh, R. H. Miller, and R. H. Purcell, “Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus: quasispecies and genotypes,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–63, 1995.
[26] T. Sy and M. M. Jamal, “Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection,” International Journal ofMedical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 41–46, 2006. [27] J. Pawlotsky, “Mechanisms of antiviral treatment efficacy and failure in chronic hepatitis C,” Antiviral Research, vol. 59, no. 1,pp. 1–11, 2003. [28] M.Nafees, M. S. Bhatti, and I.U.Haq, “Sero-prevalence of HCV Antibodies in population attending Madina Teaching hospital, Faisalabad,” Annals of King Edward Medical University, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 57–62, 2010. [29] S. Akhtar, T. Moatter, S. I. Azam, M. H. Rahbar, and S. Adil, “Prevalence and risk factors for intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus in Karachi, Pakistan,” Journal of ViralHepatitis, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 309–314, 2002. [30] N. S. Ali, K. Jamal, and R. Qureshi, “Hepatitis B vaccination status and identification of risk factors for hepatitis B in health care workers,” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons. Pakistan, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 257–260, 2005. [31]. Ryan KJ, Ray CG: Sherris medical microbiology. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004:551–552. [32]. Grobusch MP, Alpermann U, Schwenke S, Jelinek T, Warhurst DC: Falsepositive rapid tests for malaria in patients with rheumatoid factor. Lancet 1999, 353:297. [33]. Rizzetto M: Viral hepatitis: introduction. In Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology. Edited by McIntyre N, Benhamou JP, Bicher J, Rizzeto M, Rodes J. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publication; 1992:529. [34]. World Health Organization Hepatitis C: Fact sheet No. 164°. Geneva: Switzerland; 2011. [35]. Ahmad N, Asgher M, Shafique M, Qureshi JA: An evidence of high prevalence of Hepatitis C virus in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Saudi Med J 2007, 28:390–395. [36]. Aslam M, Aslam J: Seroprevalence of the antibody to hepatitis C in select groups in the Punjab region of Pakistan. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001, 33:407–411.

Djoumana Ounas

Pharmacist Assistant Professor in Analytical Chemisty. Consultance Expertise and Reglatory Biotech Support.

HCV Prevalence in Pakistan, An Alarming Situation

Djoumana Ounas

want a datasheet ?

want A Quote ?